Loading…
This event has ended. Visit the official site or create your own event on Sched.
Conference registrations have closed | Presenter and chair briefing notes and other information available here.
Self-guided historical walking tours: These walking tours are accessed via the Sydney Culture Walks app and highlight Aboriginal history, heritage & culture: https://www.sydneyculturewalksapp.com/barani-redfern 
https://www.sydneyculturewalksapp.com/barani-warrane
Monday, September 16 • 4:00pm - 4:30pm
Knowing the value of knowledge: emerging approaches to evaluating research through end user perspectives.

Sign up or log in to save this to your schedule, view media, leave feedback and see who's attending!

Feedback form is now closed.
Mohammad Alatoom (Office of Environment and Heritage), Emily Prentice (Office of Environment and Heritage), Larissa Brisbane (Office of Environment and Heritage)

Research and knowledge generation is often in the 'too hard' basket for evaluation, being viewed as a public good, a foundational activity, difficult to value economically, or combination of these. Historically, academia has valued 'research' through metrics such as impact factors, publishing records, citations and successful funding applications. While these indicators reflect academic interest in the research, they do not reveal much about the fulfilment of other end users' needs.

If evaluation judges the 'merit, worth or value' of a thing, then evaluation of targeted research activities should fully consider how the outputs and outcomes advance and enrich our knowledge, enabling more informed decision-making. The evaluation should ideally demonstrate to what extent the research provides value to end users, as well as capture any distant outcomes for peripheral end users. How, then, do we evaluate research beyond traditional academic indicators? How do we evaluate the impact and effectiveness of research programs that are in progress or yet to report findings? And how do we best engage and involve end users in research evaluation, from planning to monitoring and final execution?

We present a best practice review and its application through a case study to examine these questions in a practical context. We describe evaluation planning for a targeted research program that is designed to generate insights into a complex problem, while satisfying the needs of a diverse range of end users. We discuss integrating evaluation planning into program design, engaging end users in developing the evaluation framework, the challenges of establishing KPIs for research evaluation, and reflect briefly on capturing the longer-term outcomes and options to apply economic valuation methods.


Chairs
avatar for Sean Chung

Sean Chung

Director, Paxton Partners
Sean Chung is a Director of Paxton Partners, a specialist management consulting firm, focused exclusively on clients within the health and human services sectors. Sean has assisted clients across both Canada and Australia at multiple levels of the healthcare system - from federal... Read More →

Presenters
avatar for Larissa Brisbane

Larissa Brisbane

Team Leader, Strategic Evaluation, Dept of Planning and Environment NSW
It was only a short step from training in environmental science, and a background in cross-disciplinary problem-solving, to evaluation where I still ask 'why' and 'how do you know that'. I love hearing your stories of what you've done and what you've learned, especially in the areas... Read More →
avatar for Emily Prentice

Emily Prentice

Senior Project Officer, Strategic Evaluation and Statistics, Department of Planning, Industry and Environment (DPIE)
I'm an environmental scientist by training and spent my early career investigating the impact of contaminants in aquatic environments. I later moved into sustainability consulting where I discovered evaluation, which has proven to be the perfect match for someone accustomed to research... Read More →


Monday September 16, 2019 4:00pm - 4:30pm AEST
C2.5